Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPhtiaka, Helenen
dc.creatorPhtiaka, Helenen
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-27T10:43:02Z
dc.date.available4
dc.date.available2017-07-27T10:43:02Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn09518398
dc.identifier.issn14687941
dc.identifier.other20598823
dc.identifier.urihttps://gnosis.library.ucy.ac.cy/handle/7/38515
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the difficulties of negotiating and gaining access to a secondary school to carry out ethnographic research in Britain. Issues related to external and internal confidentiality arising from the offer of written feedback to the schools are examined. External confidentiality refers to problems connected with the schools’ need to be seen “in best performance” in the new era of competition. Internal confidentiality deals with issues of trust between the researcher and participants. Problems regarding the position of the researcher vis‐à‐vis internal school politics are identified. The influence of the research project on the participants and their setting is considered, as are the possible benefits and hazards related to the project. How the researcher dealt with ethical issues is also addressed. Oral feedback is offered as an alternative to written feedback because it reduces risks for participants and offers an opportunity to discuss problem issues within the school in a wider setting. ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]; Copyright of International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (QSE) is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)en
dc.publisherGreat Britain, SAGE PUBLICATIONSen
dc.sourceQualitative Researchen
dc.titleWhat's in it for us?; Michael Bloor and Fiona Wood, Keywords in Qualitative Methods: A Vocabulary of Research Conceptsen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.description.volume7; 10
dc.description.issue2; 3
dc.description.startingpage155; 389
dc.author.facultyΣχολή Κοινωνικών Επιστημών και Επιστημών Αγωγής / Faculty of Social Sciences and Education
dc.author.departmentΤμήμα Επιστημών της Αγωγής / Department of Education
dc.type.uhtypeArticleen
dc.description.notes75559435; J1: International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (QSE); ID: RN273622583; Review. LC: RA440.85. Dewey: 300. © COPYRIGHT THE BRITISH LIBRARY BOARD AND OTHER CONTRIBUTORS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.en


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record