Intermediaries' liability for online copyright infringement in the EU: Evolutions and confusions
Date
2015ISSN
0267-3649Source
Computer Law & Security ReviewVolume
31Pages
57-67Google Scholar check
Keyword(s):
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Nearly fifteen years ago and since the adoption of the E-commerce Directive 2000/31/EC the issue of the intermediaries' liability in Europe was thought to have been settled by the creation of a "safe harbor" regime, inspired by the American model. This article focuses on two recent jurisprudential interpretations on the question of intermediaries' liability: the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) Telekabel judgment and the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in the case Delfiv Estonia. The author analyses these evolutions and submits that intermediaries' asylum is in fact much less absolute than it looks. The article also demonstrates that intermediaries' safe harbor will have to deal with the recognition of human rights that could open new horizons to the development of the regulation of the intermediaries' liability. ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Computer Law & Security Review is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)