Feasibility of an Intervention to Support Hearing and Vision in Dementia: The SENSE‐Cog Field Trial
Ημερομηνία
2019Συγγραφέας
Hooper, EmmaSimkin, Zoe
Abrams, Harvey
Camacho, Elizabeth
Charalambous, Anna Pavlina
Collin, Fideline
Constantinidou, Fofi
Dawes, Piers
Elliott, Rachel
Falkingham, Sue
Frison, Eric
Hann, Mark
Helmer, Catherine
Himmelsbach, Ines
Hussain, Hannah
Marié, Sarah
Montecelo, Susana
Reeves, David
Regan, Jemma
Thodi, Chryssoula
Wolski, Lucas
Leroi, Iracema
ISSN
0002-86141532-5415
Source
Journal of the American Geriatrics SocietyVolume
67Issue
7Pages
1472-1477Google Scholar check
Metadata
Εμφάνιση πλήρους εγγραφήςΕπιτομή
Objectives People with dementia (PwD) frequently experience hearing and vision impairment that is underrecognized and undertreated, resulting in reduced quality of life. Managing these impairments may be an important strategy to improve outcomes in PwD. Our objective was to field‐trial a multifaceted sensory intervention (SI) to enhance hearing and vision in PwD. Design An international single‐arm open‐label feasibility, acceptability, and tolerability study. Setting Home‐based setting in the United Kingdom, France, and Cyprus. Participants Adults aged 60 years and older with mild‐to‐moderate dementia and uncorrected or suboptimally corrected hearing and/or vision impairment, and their study partners (n = 19 dyads). Intervention A sensory intervention (SI), comprising assessment of hearing and vision, fitting of corrective devices (glasses, hearing aids), and home‐based support from a sensory support therapist for device adherence and maintenance, communication training, referral to support services, environmental sensory modification, and optimization of social inclusion. Measurements Ratings of study procedure feasibility, and intervention acceptability/tolerability, ascertained through questionnaires, participant diaries, therapist logbooks, and semistructured interviews. Results We successfully delivered all intervention components, and these were received and enacted as intended in all those who completed the intervention. No serious adverse events were reported. Acceptability (ie, understanding, motivation, sense of achievement) and tolerability (ie, effort, fatigue) ratings of the intervention were within a priori target ranges. We met recruitment and retention (93.8%) targets in two of the three sites. Participants completed more than 95% of diary entries, representing minimal missing data. Delays in the logistics circuit for the assessment and delivery of hearing aids and glasses were identified, requiring modification. The need for minor modifications to some outcome measures and the inclusion criteria were identified. Conclusion This is the first study combining home‐based hearing and vision remediation in PwD. The positive feasibility, acceptability, and tolerability findings suggest that a full‐scale efficacy trial, with certain modifications, is achievable.