Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFountzilas, Georgeen
dc.contributor.authorAthanasiades, A.en
dc.contributor.authorGiannakakis, T.en
dc.contributor.authorBriassoulis, E. Chen
dc.contributor.authorBafaloukos, Dimitriosen
dc.contributor.authorKalogera-Fountzila, Annaen
dc.contributor.authorOnienaoum, A.en
dc.contributor.authorKalofonos, H. P.en
dc.contributor.authorPectasides, Dimitriosen
dc.contributor.authorAndreopoulou, E.en
dc.contributor.authorBamia, C.en
dc.contributor.authorKosmidis, Paraskevas A.en
dc.contributor.authorPavlidis, Nicholasen
dc.contributor.authorSkarlos, Dimosthenis V.en
dc.creatorFountzilas, Georgeen
dc.creatorAthanasiades, A.en
dc.creatorGiannakakis, T.en
dc.creatorBriassoulis, E. Chen
dc.creatorBafaloukos, Dimitriosen
dc.creatorKalogera-Fountzila, Annaen
dc.creatorOnienaoum, A.en
dc.creatorKalofonos, H. P.en
dc.creatorPectasides, Dimitriosen
dc.creatorAndreopoulou, E.en
dc.creatorBamia, C.en
dc.creatorKosmidis, Paraskevas A.en
dc.creatorPavlidis, Nicholasen
dc.creatorSkarlos, Dimosthenis V.en
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-22T09:53:04Z
dc.date.available2018-06-22T09:53:04Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.urihttps://gnosis.library.ucy.ac.cy/handle/7/41639
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the impact on the response rate in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) of the doubling of the dose intensity (DI) of epirubicin monotherapy. Patients and methods: From January 1991 until April 1996, 167 patients with ABC were randomized to receive epirubicin (110 mg/m2) either every four (81 patients, group A) or every two weeks (86 patients, group B). Filgrastim (5 μg/kg/daily) was administered prophylactically on days 2-12 of each cycle. Results: The two groups were equally balanced in terms of major patient and tumor characteristics. Even though the median cumulative close of epirubicin was identical in the two groups (651 mg/m2), the median DI of epirubicin was doubled in group B (27.2 vs. 52.9 mg/m2/wk, respectively). The complete response (CR) rate was significantly increased in group B (5%, 95% CI: 0.16%-9.84% vs. 17%, 95% CI: 8.9%-25.08%, P = 0.011), although overall response rates were similar (49% vs. 53%, P = 0.5957). Also, there was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 toxicity between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 25 months (range, 0.43-43.3+) no significant difference was observed in the duration of response (median, 10 months vs. 8.5 months, P = 0.5130), time to progression (median, 7.2 months vs. 7.4 months, P = 0.2970) or survival (median, 14.6 months vs. 14.9 months, P = 0.4483). Logistic regression analysis showed that performance status was a significant variable for response (P = 0.0068) and multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model revealed that performance status was significant for survival (P = 0.0049), while the presence of multiple metastases (P = 0.0020) was significant for time to progression. Conclusion: Doubling the planned DI of epirubicin monotherapy significantly increases the CR rate but has no influence on time to progression or survival in patients with ABC.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.sourceAnnals of Oncologyen
dc.subjectArticleen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectCancer chemotherapyen
dc.subjectHumanen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.subjectBreast canceren
dc.subjectControlled studyen
dc.subjectMajor clinical studyen
dc.subjectMiddle ageden
dc.subjectAdvanced canceren
dc.subjectCancer survivalen
dc.subjectChemotherapyen
dc.subjectDrug responseen
dc.subjectPriority journalen
dc.subjectClinical trialen
dc.subjectDisease-free survivalen
dc.subjectTreatment outcomeen
dc.subjectSurvival analysisen
dc.subjectDrug administration scheduleen
dc.subjectMetastasisen
dc.subjectDose responseen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectAntineoplasticen
dc.subjectEpirubicinen
dc.subjectBreast neoplasmsen
dc.subjectAntibioticsen
dc.titleA randomized study of epirubicin monotherapy every four or every two weeks in advanced breast cancer. A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Studyen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1023/A:1008270307264
dc.description.volume8
dc.description.issue12
dc.description.startingpage1213
dc.description.endingpage1220
dc.author.facultyΙατρική Σχολή / Medical School
dc.author.departmentΙατρική Σχολή / Medical School
dc.type.uhtypeArticleen
dc.contributor.orcidPavlidis, Nicholas [0000-0002-2195-9961]
dc.contributor.orcidKalogera-Fountzila, Anna [0000-0002-6801-3129]
dc.contributor.orcidKalofonos, H. P. [0000-0002-3286-778X]
dc.gnosis.orcid0000-0002-2195-9961|0000-0002-6801-3129
dc.gnosis.orcid0000-0002-3286-778X


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record