Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZenios, Michalisen
dc.contributor.authorKim, W. Y.en
dc.contributor.authorSampath, J.en
dc.contributor.authorMuddu, B. N.en
dc.creatorZenios, Michalisen
dc.creatorKim, W. Y.en
dc.creatorSampath, J.en
dc.creatorMuddu, B. N.en
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-22T09:53:38Z
dc.date.available2018-06-22T09:53:38Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.urihttps://gnosis.library.ucy.ac.cy/handle/7/41946
dc.description.abstractA randomised controlled trial was performed in 50 patients with acute isolated minimally displaced lesser metatarsal fractures in order to compare plaster immobilisation with elasticated support bandage treatment. Patients treated with elasticated support bandage had significantly higher AOFAS mid-foot scores at 3-months follow-up and complained of less pain throughout the treatment period. There was no difference between the two groups in time to independent mobility, mid-foot circumference, analgesic requirements and radiological union at 3 months. As plaster casts are associated with serious complications, which were encountered in these studies, we conclude that minimally displaced metatarsal fractures are better treated without a cast. © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.sourceInjuryen
dc.subjectTreatmenten
dc.subjectFracturesen
dc.subjectFunctionalen
dc.subjectMetatarsalen
dc.titleFunctional treatment of acute metatarsal fractures: A prospective randomised comparison of management in a cast versus elasticated support bandageen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.injury.2004.12.001
dc.description.volume36
dc.description.issue7
dc.description.startingpage832
dc.description.endingpage835
dc.author.facultyΙατρική Σχολή / Medical School
dc.author.departmentΙατρική Σχολή / Medical School
dc.type.uhtypeArticleen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record