Competition for environmental aid and aid fungibility
SourceJournal of Environmental Economics and Management
Google Scholar check
MetadataShow full item record
Aid from environmentally conscious donors to developing recipients has long been thought of as a very promising way of preserving the global environment. However, aid is fungible and recipients cannot commit to using it for the purpose it was intended. We analyze competition for aid games with aid fungibility and cross-border pollution to gain insights on how to allocate environmental aid more efficiently. We set up a two stage game of two recipients receiving aid from a donor interested in minimizing pollution. Recipients cannot commit on the use of aid but they can commit on the infrastructure necessary to use aid for pollution abatement. We find that the success of competition for aid games depends critically on the degree of cross-border pollution. This determines whether it is more efficient to set up such games between recipients with little (or a lot of) cross-border pollution between them. © 2012 Elsevier Inc.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Hatzipanayotou, Panos; Lahiri, Sajal; Michael, Michael S. (2000)
Hatzipanayotou, Panos; Lahiri, Sajal; Michael, Michael S. (2002)We develop a two-country model of foreign aid and cross-border pollution resulting from production activities in the recipient country. There is both private and public abatement of pollution, the latter being financed ...
Hadjiyiannis, Costas; Hatzipanayotou, Panos; Michael, Michael S. (2014)We analyze the case where governments have to use income tax revenue to finance public pollution abatement and relate the results to the existing literature on capital tax competition. We show that the impact of public ...