Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaytelman, Andreanien
dc.contributor.authorIordanou, Kalypsoen
dc.contributor.authorConstantinou, Constantinos P.en
dc.creatorBaytelman, Andreanien
dc.creatorIordanou, Kalypsoen
dc.creatorConstantinou, Constantinos P.en
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates whether university students’ epistemic beliefs and prior knowledge about controversial socioscientific issues (SSIs) can predict the different types of arguments that students construct. Two hundred forty-three university students were asked to construct different types of supportive arguments—social, ethical, economic, scientific, ecological—as well as counterarguments and rebuttals after they had read a scenario on a SSI. Participants’ epistemic beliefs and prior knowledge were assessed separately. Results showed that students’ epistemic beliefs and prior knowledge predicted the quantity, quality, and diversity of the different types of arguments the students constructed. In particular, students who held sophisticated epistemic beliefs about the structure of knowledge and exhibited relatively more robust prior knowledge scores, produced arguments of greater quantity, better quality, and higher diversity than students with less sophisticated epistemic beliefs and low prior knowledge scores. Educational implications are discussed.en
dc.sourceJournal of Research in Science Teachingen
dc.titleEpistemic beliefs and prior knowledge as predictors of the construction of different types of arguments on socioscientific issuesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/tea.21627Σχολή Κοινωνικών Επιστημών και Επιστημών Αγωγής / Faculty of Social Sciences and EducationΤμήμα Επιστημών της Αγωγής / Department of Education
dc.contributor.orcidConstantinou, Constantinos P. [0000-0003-3183-4131]

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record