Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMontes-Romero, Jesúsen
dc.contributor.authorAlmonacid, Florenciaen
dc.contributor.authorTheristis, Mariosen
dc.contributor.authorde la Casa, Juanen
dc.contributor.authorGeorghiou, George E.en
dc.contributor.authorFernández, Eduardo F.en
dc.creatorMontes-Romero, Jesúsen
dc.creatorAlmonacid, Florenciaen
dc.creatorTheristis, Mariosen
dc.creatorde la Casa, Juanen
dc.creatorGeorghiou, George E.en
dc.creatorFernández, Eduardo F.en
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-26T09:45:30Z
dc.date.available2021-01-26T09:45:30Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0038-092X
dc.identifier.urihttp://gnosis.library.ucy.ac.cy/handle/7/63256
dc.description.abstractModelling the current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of photovoltaic (PV) modules under real operating conditions is crucial for the better understanding of each technology. The most commonly used model for the electrical characterization of PV is the single-diode model where the five parameters are extracted through a variety of techniques. Although numerous extraction methods were developed for conventional PV technologies, the studies concerning the concentrating photovoltaic (CPV) technology are still limited. In this work, three analytical parameter extraction methods (Phang et al., Blas et al. and Khan et al.) are applied and compared for a multi-junction (MJ) CPV and a monocrystalline (m-Si) module based on long-term outdoor measurements in Jaén, Spain. The sensitivity of the models against the dominant parameters that influence the behaviour of PV and CPV (i.e. irradiance, module temperature and air mass) is also investigated. Furthermore, the effect of irradiance on the extracted parameters is discussed including the derivation of the corresponding fitting equations and errors. The results indicate that the most robust method is the one proposed by Phang et al. for the CPV module (normalised root mean square error, NRMSE, of 1.55%) and the one proposed by Blas et al. for the m-Si module (NRMSE of 0.58%). The method of Khan et al. resulted the highest error values for every case (NRMSE of 4.5% and 1.74% for CPV and m-Si respectively) while the Phang et al. method exhibited a similar error for both technologies. The main outcome of this work contributes to the optimum selection of parameter extraction techniques depending on the technology and the desired associated errors while the analysis of the dependence of the parameters on irradiance provides a better understanding of each technology’s behaviour in the field.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceSolar Energyen
dc.source.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X17310836
dc.titleComparative analysis of parameter extraction techniques for the electrical characterization of multi-junction CPV and m-Si technologiesen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.011
dc.description.volume160
dc.description.startingpage275
dc.description.endingpage288
dc.author.facultyΠολυτεχνική Σχολή / Faculty of Engineering
dc.author.departmentΤμήμα Ηλεκτρολόγων Μηχανικών και Μηχανικών Υπολογιστών / Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
dc.type.uhtypeArticleen
dc.source.abbreviationSolar Energyen
dc.contributor.orcidGeorghiou, George E. [0000-0002-5872-5851]
dc.contributor.orcidTheristis, Marios [0000-0002-7265-4922]
dc.gnosis.orcid0000-0002-5872-5851
dc.gnosis.orcid0000-0002-7265-4922


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record