Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEllinas, Antonis A.en
dc.contributor.authorSuleiman, Ezra N.en
dc.creatorEllinas, Antonis A.en
dc.creatorSuleiman, Ezra N.en
dc.description.abstractThe article uses evidence from an original survey of 200 top Commission officials to highlight the schizophrenic nature of the Kinnock reforms. It shows that the push toward the 'modernization' of the Commission has been accompanied by a trend towards 'bureaucratization'. The findings of the survey challenge the dominant view that the reform project was largely a move toward the institutional paradigm set by new public management (NPM). Based on the views of top Commission officials, the reforms can best be described as a marriage of 'Weberian-bureaucratic' and NPM ideas. This mix of largely incompatible reform measures resulted from the simultaneous effort to maximize the efficiency of the organization while responding to the legitimacy crisis that created demands for more accountability. The political nature of these demands suggests that it will be hard for the Barroso Commission to substantially change the turn toward bureaucratization.en
dc.sourceJournal of European Public Policyen
dc.titleReforming the Commission: Between modernization and bureaucratizationen
dc.description.endingpage725Σχολή Κοινωνικών Επιστημών και Επιστημών Αγωγής / Faculty of Social Sciences and EducationΤμήμα Κοινωνικών και Πολιτικών Επιστημών / Department of Social and Political Sciences
dc.source.abbreviationJ.Eur.Public Policyen
dc.contributor.orcidEllinas, Antonis A. [0000-0002-4757-5018]

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record