Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKombos, Constantinosen
dc.creatorKombos, Constantinosen
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-13T08:28:41Z
dc.date.available2019-05-13T08:28:41Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttp://gnosis.library.ucy.ac.cy/handle/7/49381
dc.description.abstractThe theme of this paper is the distinction between international and internal armed conflict and the analytical task combines the examination as to whether that distinction traditionally existed and the careful consideration as to whether the distinction remains viable and useful in the modern era of the ICTY (The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia), and the ICC (International Criminal Court). It is submitted that the reliance on the dichotomy has been the prevailing approach, but nonetheless there is currently erosion to it, alas without nullifying its legal significance. As a corollary of the blurring of the distinction, there is a clearer presentation of the core of the problem, namely States’ unwillingness to comply at the implementation stage.en
dc.sourceMediterranean Journal of Human Rightsen
dc.titleThe Traditional Distinction between International and Internal Armed Conflict: Legal Artefact or Legal Fact?en
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.description.volume10
dc.author.facultyΣχολή Κοινωνικών Επιστημών και Επιστημών Αγωγής / Faculty of Social Sciences and Education
dc.author.departmentΤμήμα Νομικής / Department of Law
dc.type.uhtypeArticleen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record