Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorParaskeva, Costasen
dc.creatorParaskeva, Costasen
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-13T08:28:49Z
dc.date.available2019-05-13T08:28:49Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn0169-3441
dc.identifier.urihttp://gnosis.library.ucy.ac.cy/handle/7/49479
dc.description.abstractThis article seeks to examine the effectiveness of the fact-finding activities undertaken by the European Court of Human Rights (and the former Commission). It argues that while some fact-finding missions have revealed certain weaknesses in the past, the very conduct of such missions remains indispensable - in the interests both of litigants and the credibility of the Strasbourg system itself. Therefore, some greater thought needs to be given to practical ways and means to fully tap the Court's fact-finding potential. © Netherlands Institute of Human Rights (SIM), Printed in the Netherlands.en
dc.sourceNetherlands Quarterly of Human Rightsen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77949716956&partnerID=40&md5=5d0c0b3f816e155c9b31b55083e702baen
dc.titleHuman rights fact-finding. The european court of human rights at a crossroadsen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen
dc.description.volume28
dc.description.startingpage41
dc.description.endingpage115
dc.author.facultyΣχολή Κοινωνικών Επιστημών και Επιστημών Αγωγής / Faculty of Social Sciences and Education
dc.author.departmentΤμήμα Νομικής / Department of Law
dc.type.uhtypeArticleen
dc.source.abbreviationNeth.Q.Hum.Rightsen
dc.description.totalnumpages41-115


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record