Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSynodinou, Tatiana-Elenien
dc.creatorSynodinou, Tatiana-Elenien
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-13T08:28:51Z
dc.date.available2019-05-13T08:28:51Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn0267-3649
dc.identifier.urihttp://gnosis.library.ucy.ac.cy/handle/7/49506
dc.description.abstractPress curiosity to report on legal proceedings has been a salacious feature in history of mass media. Pre-trial comment, media coverage of press proceedings and the protection of privacy of the defendant are some of the main legal issues which are raised by the ambiguous relation of media to court proceedings. The Internet revolution and the emergence of the blogosphere have added a new dimension to the analysis of these legal issues. A balance between freedom of expression and the guarantee of a fair unprejudiced process has to be achieved in the context of application of legal mechanisms of protection of the justice's authority, such as contempt of court. As regards the question of media coverage of the court proceedings, the decision of the UK Supreme Court on May 2011 to permit television coverage of its hearings demonstrates an important shift as regards how publicity is perceived by the administration of justice in the UK, while there is a certain disparity between national legislators in the way they deal with this issue at a European level. The legal question of the protection of the defendant through the effective guarantee of the presumption of innocence and, consequently, that of a fair trial is often combined with the debate about the right of the defendant's privacy not only when there is a pressing social need for information to the public before or during the court trial but also many years after the end of the legal proceedings. ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]en
dc.description.abstractCopyright of Computer Law & Security Review is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)en
dc.sourceComputer Law & Security Reviewen
dc.source.urihttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asn&AN=74646843&site=ehost-live
dc.subjectEUROPEen
dc.subjectPrivacyen
dc.subjectContempt of courten
dc.subjectDEFENDANTSen
dc.subjectECHRen
dc.subjectFAIRNESSen
dc.subjectFREEDOM of expressionen
dc.subjectHuman rightsen
dc.subjectINTERNETen
dc.subjectMASS mediaen
dc.subjectMedia and the courtsen
dc.subjectPRE-trial procedureen
dc.subjectPROCEDURE (Law)en
dc.subjectTelevision and the courtsen
dc.titleThe media coverage of court proceedings in Europe: Striking a balance between freedom of expression and fair processen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clsr.2012.01.013
dc.description.volume28
dc.description.startingpage208
dc.description.endingpage219
dc.author.facultyΣχολή Κοινωνικών Επιστημών και Επιστημών Αγωγής / Faculty of Social Sciences and Education
dc.author.departmentΤμήμα Νομικής / Department of Law
dc.type.uhtypeArticleen
dc.description.totalnumpages208-219


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record