Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAmgoud, L.en
dc.contributor.authorDimopoulos, Yannisen
dc.contributor.authorMoraïtis, Pavlosen
dc.creatorAmgoud, L.en
dc.creatorDimopoulos, Yannisen
dc.creatorMoraïtis, Pavlosen
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-13T10:38:12Z
dc.date.available2019-11-13T10:38:12Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-57735-384-3
dc.identifier.urihttp://gnosis.library.ucy.ac.cy/handle/7/53510
dc.description.abstractDecision making is usually based on the comparative evaluation of different alternatives by means of a decision criterion. The whole decision process is compacted into a criterion formula on the basis of which alternatives are compared. It is thus, impossible for an end user to understand why an alternative is good, or better than another. Recently, some decision criteria were articulated in terms of a two-steps argumentation process: i) an inference step in which arguments in favor/against each option are built and evaluated, and ii) a comparison step in which pairs of alternatives are compared on the basis of "accepted" arguments. Thus, not only the best alternative is provided to the user but also the reasons justifying this recommendation. However, a two steps approach is not in accordance with the principle of an argumentation system, whose accepted arguments are intended to support the "good" options. Moreover, with such an approach it is difficult to define proof procedures for testing directly whether a given option may be the best one without computing the whole ordering. Finally, it is difficult to analyze how an ordering is revised in light of a new argument. This paper proposes a novel approach for argumentationbased decision making. We propose a Dung style system that takes as input different arguments and a defeat relation among them, and returns as outputs a status for each option, and a total preordering on a set of options. The status is defined on the basis of different inference mechanisms. The total preordering privileges the option that is supported by the strongest argument, provided that this argument survives to the attacks. The properties of the system are investigated. Copyright © 2008, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.en
dc.sourcePrinciples of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference, KR 2008en
dc.source11th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR 2008en
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-71549162346&partnerID=40&md5=9fc92dc5884d5e6b074b91d85a61bb57
dc.subjectDecision makingen
dc.subjectArgumentation systemsen
dc.subjectArgumentation-based decision makingen
dc.subjectComparative evaluationsen
dc.subjectDecision criterionsen
dc.subjectDecision processen
dc.subjectEnd usersen
dc.subjectInference mechanismen
dc.subjectKnowledge representationen
dc.subjectMaking decisionen
dc.subjectProof proceduresen
dc.titleMaking decisions through preference-based argumentationen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
dc.description.startingpage113
dc.description.endingpage123
dc.author.faculty002 Σχολή Θετικών και Εφαρμοσμένων Επιστημών / Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences
dc.author.departmentΤμήμα Πληροφορικής / Department of Computer Science
dc.type.uhtypeConference Objecten
dc.description.notes<p>Conference code: 89516en
dc.description.notesCited By :24</p>en
dc.contributor.orcidDimopoulos, Yannis [0000-0001-9583-9754]


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record