Comments on a method of comparison of randomized response techniques
AuthorChristofides, Tasos C.
SourceJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference
Google Scholar check
MetadataShow full item record
In a forthcoming paper (A unified framework for analysis and comparison of randomized response surveys of binary characteristics, J. Stat. Plan. Infer., doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2008.12.013) Nayak and Adeshiyan (2009) claimed, among other things, that all randomized response techniques with three or more response categories are essentially of no or little value. In this note, we provide some very brief comments on their claim. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.