Comments on a method of comparison of randomized response techniques
Date
2010Source
Journal of Statistical Planning and InferenceVolume
140Issue
2Pages
574-575Google Scholar check
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In a forthcoming paper (A unified framework for analysis and comparison of randomized response surveys of binary characteristics, J. Stat. Plan. Infer., doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2008.12.013) Nayak and Adeshiyan (2009) claimed, among other things, that all randomized response techniques with three or more response categories are essentially of no or little value. In this note, we provide some very brief comments on their claim. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.