Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChristofides, Tasos C.en
dc.creatorChristofides, Tasos C.en
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-02T10:34:26Z
dc.date.available2019-12-02T10:34:26Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.urihttp://gnosis.library.ucy.ac.cy/handle/7/56631
dc.description.abstractIn a forthcoming paper (A unified framework for analysis and comparison of randomized response surveys of binary characteristics, J. Stat. Plan. Infer., doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2008.12.013) Nayak and Adeshiyan (2009) claimed, among other things, that all randomized response techniques with three or more response categories are essentially of no or little value. In this note, we provide some very brief comments on their claim. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.sourceJournal of Statistical Planning and Inferenceen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-70350352531&doi=10.1016%2fj.jspi.2009.07.018&partnerID=40&md5=76590c1b1ee7dd84675fc35f17affc65
dc.titleComments on a method of comparison of randomized response techniquesen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jspi.2009.07.018
dc.description.volume140
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.startingpage574
dc.description.endingpage575
dc.author.facultyΣχολή Θετικών και Εφαρμοσμένων Επιστημών / Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences
dc.author.departmentΤμήμα Μαθηματικών και Στατιστικής / Department of Mathematics and Statistics
dc.type.uhtypeArticleen
dc.description.notes<p>Cited By :6</p>en
dc.source.abbreviationJ.Stat.Plann.Inferenceen
dc.contributor.orcidChristofides, Tasos C. [0000-0001-6121-0683]
dc.gnosis.orcid0000-0001-6121-0683


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record