Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLoizides, Antisen
dc.creatorLoizides, Antisen
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-25T08:31:20Z
dc.date.available2021-01-25T08:31:20Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1479-2443
dc.identifier.issn1479-2451
dc.identifier.urihttp://gnosis.library.ucy.ac.cy/handle/7/62747
dc.description.abstractIn his biography of James Mill, Alexander Bain made a number of claims with regard to Mill's essay “Government” (1820). First, the essay was a catalyst in the movement for reform, making “in all probability . . . our political history very different from what it might otherwise have been.” Second, the essay provided a unique opportunity for Mill to expound on “the whole theory of Government in a compact shape.” Third, as far as his “Logic of Politics” was concerned, Mill depended on the deductive method—the method of geometry—having quickly discarded the applicability of inductive logic in politics. In this article, I take issue with the last claim.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceModern Intellectual Historyen
dc.source.urihttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1479244315000219/type/journal_article
dc.titleInduction, Deduction, and James Mill’s “Government”en
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1479244315000219
dc.description.volume15
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.startingpage33
dc.description.endingpage61
dc.author.facultyΣχολή Κοινωνικών Επιστημών και Επιστημών Αγωγής / Faculty of Social Sciences and Education
dc.author.departmentΤμήμα Κοινωνικών και Πολιτικών Επιστημών / Department of Social and Political Sciences
dc.type.uhtypeArticleen
dc.source.abbreviationMod. Intell. Hist.en
dc.contributor.orcidLoizides, Antis [0000-0002-3587-6059]
dc.gnosis.orcid0000-0002-3587-6059


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record