dc.contributor.author | Vrahimis, Andreas | |
dc.creator | | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-26T17:55:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-12-26T17:55:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0024-5836 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://gnosis.library.ucy.ac.cy/handle/7/65858 | |
dc.description.abstract | The history of early analytic philosophy, and especially the work of the logical empiricists, has often been seen as involving antagonisms with rival schools. Though recent scholarship has interrogated the Vienna Circle’s relations with e.g. phenomenology and Neo-Kantianism, important works by some of its leading members are involved in responding to the rising tide of Lebensphilosophie. This paper will explore Carnap’s configuration of the relation between Lebensphilosophie and the overcoming of metaphysics, Schlick’s responses to Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, and Neurath’s reaction against Spengler. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.source | Logique et Analyse | en |
dc.source.uri | https://poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php?url=article&id=3289336&journal_code=LEA | en |
dc.subject | Vienna Circle | en |
dc.subject | Moritz Schlick | en |
dc.subject | Rudolf Carnap | en |
dc.subject | Otto Neurath | en |
dc.subject | Lebensphilosophie | en |
dc.subject | Nietzsche | en |
dc.subject | Dilthey | en |
dc.subject | Spengler | en |
dc.title | The Vienna Circle’s responses to Lebensphilosophie | en |
dc.type | | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2143/LEA.253.0.3289336 | en |
dc.description.volume | 253 | en |
dc.description.startingpage | 43 | en |
dc.description.endingpage | 66 | en |
dc.author.faculty | 008 Φιλοσοφική Σχολή / Faculty of Letters | |
dc.author.department | Τμήμα Κλασικών Σπουδών και Φιλοσοφίας / Department of Classics and Philosophy | |
dc.type.uhtype | Article | en |
dc.contributor.orcid | Vrahimis, Andreas [0000-0002-3409-6034] | en |
dc.type.subtype | SCIENTIFIC_JOURNAL | en |
dc.gnosis.orcid | | |