Uranium recovery from phosphate rocks/minerals – A comprehensive review

Abstract

Although the use of nuclear energy is still viewed with caution due to various problems associated, such as the safe operation of 'aging' nuclear plants and the final disposal of nuclear waste, many countries in Europe are now increasingly considering nuclear energy as an alternative to reducing fossil fuel energy production. At the present stage primary sources of uranium are sufficient to meet uranium needs and secondary sources are becoming increasingly important in terms of their long-term availability and environmental friendliness. Mining/recovery of uranium from secondary sources (such as phosphate minerals) is considerably safer in terms of exposure to radiological radiation and therefore requires less stringent safety measures. Uranium is also present in waste produced from certain industrial processes such as fertilizer production industry (e.g. phoshogypsum) and in nuclear waste. This work refers to the extraction and recovery of uranium from phosphate rocks, which is directly related to the production of uranium-free phosphate fertilizers and aims to limit environmental pollution related to the use of phosphate fertilizers. Since the chemistry during the leaching step is critical to efficient uranium recovery, various investigations have been carried to study various parameters that play an important role in achieving an optimum uranium extraction from rocks. Uranium leaching is carried out under acidic or alkaline conditions and the choice of chemistry is determined by the mineralogy of the host rocks. Acid leaching yields a higher recovery than alkaline leaching because the matrix is often more resistant to alkali than to acid leaching. However, the alkaline leaching process has the advantage of leading to the precipitation of a comparatively purer product directly from the leaching liquid. In addition, the washing solutions can be regenerated for further use, making this method more environmentally friendly. Recently alternative methods have been proposed which make use of uranium complexing ligands (e.g. EDTA) to achieve more efficient and selective uranium recovery.