Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: A meta-analysis
Ioannidis, J. P. A.
SourceJournal of the National Cancer Institute
Google Scholar check
MetadataShow full item record
Background: Interest in the use of preoperative systemic treatment in the management of breast cancer has increased because such neoadjuvant therapy appears to reduce the extent of local surgery required. We compared the clinical end points of patients with breast cancer treated preoperatively with systemic therapy (neoadjuvant therapy) and of those treated postoperatively with the same regimen (adjuvant therapy) in a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Methods: We evaluated nine randomized studies, including a total of 3946 patients with breast cancer, that compared neoadjuvant therapy with adjuvant therapy regardless of what additional surgery and/or radiation treatment was used. Fixed and random effects methods were used to combine data. Primary outcomes were death, disease progression, distant disease recurrence, and loco-regional disease recurrence. Secondary outcomes were local response and conservative local treatment. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: We found no statistically or clinically significant difference between neoadjuvant therapy and adjuvant therapy arms associated with death (summary risk ratio [RR] = 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.90 to 1.12), disease progression (summary RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.91 to 1.07), or distant disease recurrence (summary RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.06). However, neoadjuvant therapy was statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of loco-regional disease recurrences (RR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.43), compared with adjuvant therapy, especially in trials where more patients in the neoadjuvant, than the adjuvant, arm received radiation therapy without surgery (RR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.11 to 2.10). Across trials, we observed heterogeneity in the rates of complete clinical response (range = 7%-65%; P for heterogeneity of <.001), pathologic response (range = 4%-29%; P for heterogeneity of <.001), and adoption of conservative local treatment (range = 28%-89% in neoadjuvant arms, P for heterogeneity of <.001). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy was apparently equivalent to adjuvant therapy in terms of survival and overall disease progression. Neoadjuvant therapy, compared with adjuvant therapy, was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of loco-regional recurrence when radiotherapy without surgery was adopted. © Oxford University Press 2005, all rights reserved.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Gene expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and microtubule-associated protein Tau in high-risk early breast cancer: A quest for molecular predictors of treatment benefit in the context of a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group trial Pentheroudakis, George; Kalogeras, K. T.; Wirtz, R. M.; Grimani, I.; Zografos, G.; Gogas, H.; Stropp, U.; Pectasides, Dimitrios; Skarlos, Dimosthenis V.; Hennig, G.; Samantas, E.; Bafaloukos, Dimitrios; Papakostas, P.; Kalofonos, H. P.; Pavlidis, Nicholas; Fountzilas, George (2009)Background Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) protein expression carry weak prognostic and moderate predictive utility for the outcome of early breast cancer patients on adjuvant chemohormonotherapy. ...
Re: Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: A meta-analysis (multiple letters)  Popat, S.; Smith, I. E.; Mauri, D.; Pavlidis, Nicholas; Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005)
Triple-negative phenotype is of adverse prognostic value in patients treated with dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy: A translational research analysis in the context of a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) randomized phase III trial Skarlos, P.; Christodoulou, C.; Kalogeras, K. T.; Eleftheraki, A. G.; Bobos, M.; Batistatou, Anna; Valavanis, C.; Tzaida, O.; Timotheadou, E.; Kronenwett, R.; Wirtz, R. M.; Kostopoulos, I.; Televantou, D.; Koutselini, E.; Papaspirou, I.; Papadimitriou, C.; Pectasides, Dimitrios; Gogas, H.; Aravantinos, Gerasimos; Pavlidis, Nicholas; Arapantoni, P.; Skarlos, Dimosthenis V.; Fountzilas, George (2012)Purpose: It is well recognized that breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. The purpose of the current study was to classify patients according to the immunohistochemical phenotype of their tumors in an effort to evaluate ...