Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKirschel, A. N. G.en
dc.contributor.authorEarl, D. A.en
dc.contributor.authorYao, Y.en
dc.contributor.authorEscobar, I. A.en
dc.contributor.authorVilches, E.en
dc.contributor.authorVallejo, E. E.en
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, C. E.en
dc.creatorKirschel, A. N. G.en
dc.creatorEarl, D. A.en
dc.creatorYao, Y.en
dc.creatorEscobar, I. A.en
dc.creatorVilches, E.en
dc.creatorVallejo, E. E.en
dc.creatorTaylor, C. E.en
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-04T12:52:11Z
dc.date.available2019-11-04T12:52:11Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttp://gnosis.library.ucy.ac.cy/handle/7/53183
dc.description.abstractThis study compares the ability of four classification methods to distinguish between songs of individual Mexican Antthrush Formicarius moniliger: self-organizing maps (SOMs), discriminant function analysis, fuzzy logic and hidden Markov models. Recordings were made under field conditions in a Mexican rainforest. Two types of data were analysed—recordings from birds that had been ringed and identified to sex, and recordings from birds that had been identified based on their recording location and song timing. An event detector extracted song features and SOMs were used to confirm the number of individuals recorded. The SOM separated all five ringed birds successfully, and also differentiated two other birds that were not identified while vocalising. The three supervised learning methods correctly classified over 97% of songs to individual from the set of identified recordings. Tests with songs for predicted, rather than known, individuals yielded more variable results across methods, with results ranging from 77.8% to 93.9% correctly identified. The respective merits of the three supervised classification procedures are discussed for automated recording, detection and classification. © 2009 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.en
dc.sourceBioacousticsen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-73949136226&doi=10.1080%2f09524622.2009.9753612&partnerID=40&md5=b388ef367cba51e1582ee3b7f04f39ca
dc.subjectnumerical modelen
dc.subjectmodel testen
dc.subjectSelf-organizing mapsen
dc.subjectcomparative studyen
dc.subjectclassificationen
dc.subjectHidden Markov modelsen
dc.subjectBioacousticsen
dc.subjectsongbirden
dc.subjectvocalizationen
dc.subjectAvesen
dc.subjectidentification methoden
dc.subjectdiscriminant analysisen
dc.subjectrainforesten
dc.subjectFormicariusen
dc.subjectdata interpretationen
dc.subjectfuzzy mathematicsen
dc.subjectself organizationen
dc.subjectVocal individualityen
dc.titleUsing songs to identify individual mexican antthrush formicarius moniliger: Comparison of four classification methodsen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09524622.2009.9753612
dc.description.volume19
dc.description.startingpage1
dc.description.endingpage20
dc.author.facultyΣχολή Θετικών και Εφαρμοσμένων Επιστημών / Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences
dc.author.departmentΤμήμα Βιολογικών Επιστημών / Department of Biological Sciences
dc.type.uhtypeArticleen
dc.description.notes<p>Cited By :15</p>en
dc.source.abbreviationBioacousticsen
dc.contributor.orcidKirschel, A. N. G. [0000-0003-4379-7956]
dc.gnosis.orcid0000-0003-4379-7956


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record