Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNeofytou, Maria C.en
dc.contributor.authorTsangaras, Kyriakosen
dc.contributor.authorKypri, Elenaen
dc.contributor.authorLoizides, Charalambosen
dc.contributor.authorIoannides, Mariosen
dc.contributor.authorAchilleos, Achilleas P.en
dc.contributor.authorMina, Petrosen
dc.contributor.authorKeravnou, Annaen
dc.contributor.authorSismani, Carolinaen
dc.contributor.authorKoumbaris, George L.en
dc.contributor.authorPatsalis, Philippos C.en
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-04T12:52:24Z
dc.date.available2019-11-04T12:52:24Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://gnosis.library.ucy.ac.cy/handle/7/53269
dc.description.abstractNoninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using whole genome and targeted sequencing has become increasingly accepted for clinical detection of Trisomy 21 and sex chromosome aneuploidies. Few studies have shown that sub-chromosomal deletions or duplications associated with genetic syndromes can also be detected in the fetus noninvasively. There are still limitations on these methodologies such as the detection of variants of unknown clinical significance, high number of false positives, and difficulties to detect small aberrations. We utilized a recently developed targeted sequencing approach for the development of a NIPT assay, for large and small size deletions/duplications, which overcomes these existing limitations. Artificial pregnancies with microdeletion/microduplication syndromes were created by spiking DNA from affected samples into cell free DNA (cfDNA) from non-pregnant samples. Unaffected spiked samples and normal pregnancies were used as controls. Target Capture Sequences (TACS) for seven syndromes were designed and utilized for targeted capture enrichment followed by sequencing. Data was analyzed using a statistical pipeline to identify deletions or duplications on targeted regions. Following the assay development a proof of concept study using 33 normal pregnancies, 21 artificial affected and 17 artificial unaffected pregnancies was carried out to test the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. All 21 abnormal spiked-in samples were correctly classified as subchromosomal aneuploidies while the 33 normal pregnancies or 17 normal spiked-in samples resulted in a false positive result. We have developed an NIPT assay for the detection of sub-chromosomal deletions and duplications using the targeted capture enrichment technology. This assay demonstrates high accuracy, high read depth of the genomic region of interest, and can identify deletions/duplications as small as 0.5 Mb. NIPT of fetal microdeletion/microduplication syndromes can be of enormous benefit in the management of pregnancies at risk both for prospective parents and health care providers.en
dc.sourcePlos Oneen
dc.source.urihttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mdc&AN=28158220&lang=el&site=ehost-live
dc.titleTargeted capture enrichment assay for non-invasive prenatal testing of large and small size sub-chromosomal deletions and duplicationsen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0171319
dc.description.volume12
dc.description.startingpagee0171319
dc.description.endingpagee0171319
dc.type.uhtypeArticleen
dc.description.notes<p>ID: 28158220en
dc.description.notesAccession Number: 28158220. Language: English. Date Revised: 20170224. Date Created: 20170203. Update Code: 20170225. Publication Type: Journal Article. Journal ID: 101285081. Publication Model: Electronic-eCollectionen
dc.description.noteseCollection. Cited Medium: Internet. NLM ISO Abbr: PLoS ONE. Comment: Cites: PLoS One. 2010 Nov 16en
dc.description.notes5(11):e14004. (PMID: 21103372). Cites: PLoS One. 2014 Apr 21en
dc.description.notes9(4):e95633. (PMID: 24752422). Cites: Prenat Diagn. 2010 Decen
dc.description.notes30(12-13):1131-7. (PMID: 20925131). Cites: Clin Chem. 2015 Apren
dc.description.notes61(4):608-16. (PMID: 25710461). Cites: Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sepen
dc.description.notes126(3):691-2. (PMID: 26287784). Cites: Genet Med. 2006 Noven
dc.description.notes8(11):719-27. (PMID: 17108764). Cites: Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2010 Junen
dc.description.notes2010(6):pdb.prot5448. (PMID: 20516186). Cites: Clin Chem. 2012 Julen
dc.description.notes58(7):1148-51. (PMID: 22563040). Cites: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Janen
dc.description.notes47(1):53-7. (PMID: 26033469). Cites: Clin Chem. 2005 Sepen
dc.description.notes51(9):1598-604. (PMID: 16020496). Cites: Clin Chem. 2008 Octen
dc.description.notes54(10):1664-72. (PMID: 18703764). Cites: BMJ. 2011 Jan 11en
dc.description.notes342:c7401. (PMID: 21224326). Cites: Sci Transl Med. 2010 Dec 8en
dc.description.notes2(61):61ra91. (PMID: 21148127). Cites: Bioinformatics. 2012 Jun 15en
dc.description.notes28(12):1647-9. (PMID: 22543367). Cites: Prenat Diagn. 2013 Julen
dc.description.notes33(7):650-5. (PMID: 23619923). Cites: Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Noven
dc.description.notes23(11):1438-50. (PMID: 25782669). Cites: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Junen
dc.description.notes45(6):631-8. (PMID: 25904437). Cites: Nat Med. 2011 Apren
dc.description.notes17(4):510-3. (PMID: 21378977). Cites: Prenat Diagn. 2015 Julen
dc.description.notes35(7):656-62. (PMID: 25728633). Cites: Clin Chem. 2016 Junen
dc.description.notes62(6):848-55. (PMID: 27117469). Cites: Blood. 2011 Mar 31en
dc.description.notes117(13):3684-91. (PMID: 21263151). Cites: Lancet. 2003 Oct 25en
dc.description.notes362(9393):1366-73. (PMID: 14585638). Cites: Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Apren
dc.description.notes84(4):524-33. (PMID: 19344873). Cites: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feben
dc.description.notes47(2):177-83. (PMID: 26396068). Cites: Prenat Diagn. 2013 Julen
dc.description.notes33(7):667-74. (PMID: 23592541). Cites: N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 6en
dc.description.notes367(23):2175-84. (PMID: 23215555). Cites: Genome Res. 2010 Sepen
dc.description.notes20(9):1297-303. (PMID: 20644199). Cites: Haemophilia. 2008 Mayen
dc.description.notes14(3):593-8. (PMID: 18328062). Cites: Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Jan 7en
dc.description.notes98(1):34-44. (PMID: 26708752). Cites: PLoS One. 2013 Apr 29en
dc.description.notes8(4):e62856. (PMID: 23638157). Cites: Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15en
dc.description.notes25(16):2078-9. (PMID: 19505943). Cites: Reproduction. 2003 Sepen
dc.description.notes126(3):279-97. (PMID: 12968936). Cites: Clin Chem. 2010 Augen
dc.description.notes56(8):1279-86. (PMID: 20558635). Cites: Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2014en
dc.description.notes15:215-44. (PMID: 24773319). Cites: Prenat Diagn. 2011 Janen
dc.description.notes31(1):7-15. (PMID: 21210475). Cites: Arch Dis Child. 2004 Feben
dc.description.notes89(2):148-51. (PMID: 14736631). Cites: N Engl J Med. 2011 Nov 10en
dc.description.notes365(19):1847-8. (PMID: 22070496). Cites: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feben
dc.description.notes47(2):137-41. (PMID: 26833636). Cites: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Augen
dc.description.notes215(2):227.e1-227.e16. (PMID: 26899906). Cites: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Janen
dc.description.notes45(1):16-26. (PMID: 25042845). Cites: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Maren
dc.description.notes212(3):332.e1-9. (PMID: 25479548). Cites: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 24en
dc.description.notes112(47):14670-5. (PMID: 26554006). Cites: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Janen
dc.description.notes41(1):26-32. (PMID: 23108725). Cites: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 7en
dc.description.notes104(32):13116-21. (PMID: 17664418). Cites: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 21en
dc.description.notes105(42):16266-71. (PMID: 18838674). Cites: J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2010 Sepen
dc.description.notes31(7):582-91. (PMID: 20814257). Cites: Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Noven
dc.description.notes126(5):1095-9. (PMID: 26444108). Cites: Genes (Basel). 2014 Apr 09en
dc.description.notes5(2):310-29. (PMID: 24722507). Cites: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Julen
dc.description.notes18(1):9-17. (PMID: 11489218). Cites: Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 15en
dc.description.notes25(14):1754-60. (PMID: 19451168). Cites: Am J Hum Genet. 2013 Feb 7en
dc.description.notes92(2):167-76. (PMID: 23313373). Cites: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Dec 23en
dc.description.notes105(51):20458-63. (PMID: 19073917). Cites: Prenat Diagn. 2015 Augen
dc.description.notes35(8):801-9. (PMID: 25962607). Cites: Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2014 Janen
dc.description.notes57(1):11-6. (PMID: 24596813). Linking ISSN: 19326203. Subset: In-Data-Reviewen
dc.description.notesDate of Electronic Publication: 20170203.en
dc.description.notesOriginal Imprints: Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science</p>en
dc.source.abbreviationPLoS Oneen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record